Review




Structured Review

Azenta generation sequencing ngs services
Generation Sequencing Ngs Services, supplied by Azenta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/generation+sequencing+ngs+services/pmc12380100-348-15-8?v=Azenta
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
generation sequencing ngs services - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

98
Foundation Medicine Inc next generation sequencing ngs service platform
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs Service Platform, supplied by Foundation Medicine Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/generation+sequencing+ngs+services/10__1007_slash_s12254___021___00724___2-34-12-19?v=Foundation+Medicine+Inc
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
next generation sequencing ngs service platform - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Biodesign International Inc generation sequencing ngs service
Generation Sequencing Ngs Service, supplied by Biodesign International Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/generation+sequencing+ngs+services/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__04__03__716437-106-3-10?v=Biodesign+International+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
generation sequencing ngs service - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Azenta generation sequencing ngs services
Generation Sequencing Ngs Services, supplied by Azenta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/generation+sequencing+ngs+services/pmc12380100-348-15-8?v=Azenta
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
generation sequencing ngs services - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Clevergene Biocorp Pvt next-generation sequencing (ngs) services
Next Generation Sequencing (Ngs) Services, supplied by Clevergene Biocorp Pvt, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/generation+sequencing+ngs+services/pm39608199-241-12-8?v=Clevergene+Biocorp+Pvt
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
next-generation sequencing (ngs) services - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Azenta amez service for next generation sequencing (ngs)
Amez Service For Next Generation Sequencing (Ngs), supplied by Azenta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/generation+sequencing+ngs+services/ppr0758045-297-6-14?v=Azenta
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
amez service for next generation sequencing (ngs) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Azenta amez service next generation sequencing (ngs
Editing GSH1 in S. mansoni showed an efficiency bias for Cas12a vs. Cas9 and prominent deletion patterns at this target locus. Synopsis of the comparative approach using Cas9 and Cas12a for programmed gene editing with the S. mansoni egg as biological target for transformation by electroporation. (A) Shown is a schematic overview of the GSH1 (SM_V7_Chr3; 13380432-13381848; 1,416 bp) target sites for Cas9 (blue arrow) and Cas12a (red arrow). DNA cleavage by Cas9 was expected to result in a blunt-ended cut, whereas Cas12a digested released overhanging DNA strands. The non-target DNA strand at GSH1was expected to be cleaved at the same position as illustrated. GSH1 regions highlighted in magenta represent the short homology arms, 50 nt used for the donor template. (B) LEs were subjected to electroporation in the presence of CX Rhodamine-labelled RNPs (red), after which they were counterstained with Hoechst33342 (blue) and examined by CLSM 24 h later. Introduction of RNPs was demonstrated (arrows) with both nucleases. The majority of Cas9 RNPs accumulated around the eggshell, a dissimilar pattern to that observed in the Cas12a RNP-treated LEs, where signals were also found inside the eggs. (C) Results of the determination of editing efficiencies by InDel abundance generated by Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs in GSH1, as analyzed by TIDE analysis . The editing efficiencies of GSH1-targeting RNPs normalized to the wild-type sequence (KO-Cas9, dark blue bar; KO-Cas12a, red bar) and RNPs non-specific to the S. mansoni genome (scramble-Cas9, purple bar; scramble-Cas12a, orange bar), respectively are shown. The editing efficiency of LEs treated with RNPs were significantly higher compared to LEs from the scramble control (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; t test, n = 9). Compared with Cas9-RNPs, treatment with Cas12a-RNPs (red) showed a statistically significant higher editing efficiency. (D) , Representative examples of <t>NGS</t> reads or Cas12a and Cas9, respectively, to show alleles with frequently seen profiles of deletions at the programmed cleavage positions e (red arrows) (n = 3). Abbreviations: CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; KO, knock-out, ns, not statistic significant; wt, wild type.
Amez Service Next Generation Sequencing (Ngs, supplied by Azenta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/generation+sequencing+ngs+services/bio_rxiv__2023__09__12__557428-131-10-13?v=Azenta
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
amez service next generation sequencing (ngs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Macrogen next generation sequencing (ngs) service
Editing GSH1 in S. mansoni showed an efficiency bias for Cas12a vs. Cas9 and prominent deletion patterns at this target locus. Synopsis of the comparative approach using Cas9 and Cas12a for programmed gene editing with the S. mansoni egg as biological target for transformation by electroporation. (A) Shown is a schematic overview of the GSH1 (SM_V7_Chr3; 13380432-13381848; 1,416 bp) target sites for Cas9 (blue arrow) and Cas12a (red arrow). DNA cleavage by Cas9 was expected to result in a blunt-ended cut, whereas Cas12a digested released overhanging DNA strands. The non-target DNA strand at GSH1was expected to be cleaved at the same position as illustrated. GSH1 regions highlighted in magenta represent the short homology arms, 50 nt used for the donor template. (B) LEs were subjected to electroporation in the presence of CX Rhodamine-labelled RNPs (red), after which they were counterstained with Hoechst33342 (blue) and examined by CLSM 24 h later. Introduction of RNPs was demonstrated (arrows) with both nucleases. The majority of Cas9 RNPs accumulated around the eggshell, a dissimilar pattern to that observed in the Cas12a RNP-treated LEs, where signals were also found inside the eggs. (C) Results of the determination of editing efficiencies by InDel abundance generated by Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs in GSH1, as analyzed by TIDE analysis . The editing efficiencies of GSH1-targeting RNPs normalized to the wild-type sequence (KO-Cas9, dark blue bar; KO-Cas12a, red bar) and RNPs non-specific to the S. mansoni genome (scramble-Cas9, purple bar; scramble-Cas12a, orange bar), respectively are shown. The editing efficiency of LEs treated with RNPs were significantly higher compared to LEs from the scramble control (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; t test, n = 9). Compared with Cas9-RNPs, treatment with Cas12a-RNPs (red) showed a statistically significant higher editing efficiency. (D) , Representative examples of <t>NGS</t> reads or Cas12a and Cas9, respectively, to show alleles with frequently seen profiles of deletions at the programmed cleavage positions e (red arrows) (n = 3). Abbreviations: CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; KO, knock-out, ns, not statistic significant; wt, wild type.
Next Generation Sequencing (Ngs) Service, supplied by Macrogen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/generation+sequencing+ngs+services/pmc09530326-52-6-12?v=Macrogen
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
next generation sequencing (ngs) service - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Twist Bioscience next-generation sequencing (ngs) services
Editing GSH1 in S. mansoni showed an efficiency bias for Cas12a vs. Cas9 and prominent deletion patterns at this target locus. Synopsis of the comparative approach using Cas9 and Cas12a for programmed gene editing with the S. mansoni egg as biological target for transformation by electroporation. (A) Shown is a schematic overview of the GSH1 (SM_V7_Chr3; 13380432-13381848; 1,416 bp) target sites for Cas9 (blue arrow) and Cas12a (red arrow). DNA cleavage by Cas9 was expected to result in a blunt-ended cut, whereas Cas12a digested released overhanging DNA strands. The non-target DNA strand at GSH1was expected to be cleaved at the same position as illustrated. GSH1 regions highlighted in magenta represent the short homology arms, 50 nt used for the donor template. (B) LEs were subjected to electroporation in the presence of CX Rhodamine-labelled RNPs (red), after which they were counterstained with Hoechst33342 (blue) and examined by CLSM 24 h later. Introduction of RNPs was demonstrated (arrows) with both nucleases. The majority of Cas9 RNPs accumulated around the eggshell, a dissimilar pattern to that observed in the Cas12a RNP-treated LEs, where signals were also found inside the eggs. (C) Results of the determination of editing efficiencies by InDel abundance generated by Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs in GSH1, as analyzed by TIDE analysis . The editing efficiencies of GSH1-targeting RNPs normalized to the wild-type sequence (KO-Cas9, dark blue bar; KO-Cas12a, red bar) and RNPs non-specific to the S. mansoni genome (scramble-Cas9, purple bar; scramble-Cas12a, orange bar), respectively are shown. The editing efficiency of LEs treated with RNPs were significantly higher compared to LEs from the scramble control (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; t test, n = 9). Compared with Cas9-RNPs, treatment with Cas12a-RNPs (red) showed a statistically significant higher editing efficiency. (D) , Representative examples of <t>NGS</t> reads or Cas12a and Cas9, respectively, to show alleles with frequently seen profiles of deletions at the programmed cleavage positions e (red arrows) (n = 3). Abbreviations: CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; KO, knock-out, ns, not statistic significant; wt, wild type.
Next Generation Sequencing (Ngs) Services, supplied by Twist Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/generation+sequencing+ngs+services/pmc09744534-60-11-0?v=Twist+Bioscience
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
next-generation sequencing (ngs) services - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Qiagen next-generation sequencing (ngs) analysis service for qiaseq targeted dna panels
Editing GSH1 in S. mansoni showed an efficiency bias for Cas12a vs. Cas9 and prominent deletion patterns at this target locus. Synopsis of the comparative approach using Cas9 and Cas12a for programmed gene editing with the S. mansoni egg as biological target for transformation by electroporation. (A) Shown is a schematic overview of the GSH1 (SM_V7_Chr3; 13380432-13381848; 1,416 bp) target sites for Cas9 (blue arrow) and Cas12a (red arrow). DNA cleavage by Cas9 was expected to result in a blunt-ended cut, whereas Cas12a digested released overhanging DNA strands. The non-target DNA strand at GSH1was expected to be cleaved at the same position as illustrated. GSH1 regions highlighted in magenta represent the short homology arms, 50 nt used for the donor template. (B) LEs were subjected to electroporation in the presence of CX Rhodamine-labelled RNPs (red), after which they were counterstained with Hoechst33342 (blue) and examined by CLSM 24 h later. Introduction of RNPs was demonstrated (arrows) with both nucleases. The majority of Cas9 RNPs accumulated around the eggshell, a dissimilar pattern to that observed in the Cas12a RNP-treated LEs, where signals were also found inside the eggs. (C) Results of the determination of editing efficiencies by InDel abundance generated by Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs in GSH1, as analyzed by TIDE analysis . The editing efficiencies of GSH1-targeting RNPs normalized to the wild-type sequence (KO-Cas9, dark blue bar; KO-Cas12a, red bar) and RNPs non-specific to the S. mansoni genome (scramble-Cas9, purple bar; scramble-Cas12a, orange bar), respectively are shown. The editing efficiency of LEs treated with RNPs were significantly higher compared to LEs from the scramble control (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; t test, n = 9). Compared with Cas9-RNPs, treatment with Cas12a-RNPs (red) showed a statistically significant higher editing efficiency. (D) , Representative examples of <t>NGS</t> reads or Cas12a and Cas9, respectively, to show alleles with frequently seen profiles of deletions at the programmed cleavage positions e (red arrows) (n = 3). Abbreviations: CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; KO, knock-out, ns, not statistic significant; wt, wild type.
Next Generation Sequencing (Ngs) Analysis Service For Qiaseq Targeted Dna Panels, supplied by Qiagen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/generation+sequencing+ngs+services/pmc07912374-74-11-17?v=Qiagen
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
next-generation sequencing (ngs) analysis service for qiaseq targeted dna panels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Ebiogen Inc next-generation sequencing (ngs) services
Editing GSH1 in S. mansoni showed an efficiency bias for Cas12a vs. Cas9 and prominent deletion patterns at this target locus. Synopsis of the comparative approach using Cas9 and Cas12a for programmed gene editing with the S. mansoni egg as biological target for transformation by electroporation. (A) Shown is a schematic overview of the GSH1 (SM_V7_Chr3; 13380432-13381848; 1,416 bp) target sites for Cas9 (blue arrow) and Cas12a (red arrow). DNA cleavage by Cas9 was expected to result in a blunt-ended cut, whereas Cas12a digested released overhanging DNA strands. The non-target DNA strand at GSH1was expected to be cleaved at the same position as illustrated. GSH1 regions highlighted in magenta represent the short homology arms, 50 nt used for the donor template. (B) LEs were subjected to electroporation in the presence of CX Rhodamine-labelled RNPs (red), after which they were counterstained with Hoechst33342 (blue) and examined by CLSM 24 h later. Introduction of RNPs was demonstrated (arrows) with both nucleases. The majority of Cas9 RNPs accumulated around the eggshell, a dissimilar pattern to that observed in the Cas12a RNP-treated LEs, where signals were also found inside the eggs. (C) Results of the determination of editing efficiencies by InDel abundance generated by Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs in GSH1, as analyzed by TIDE analysis . The editing efficiencies of GSH1-targeting RNPs normalized to the wild-type sequence (KO-Cas9, dark blue bar; KO-Cas12a, red bar) and RNPs non-specific to the S. mansoni genome (scramble-Cas9, purple bar; scramble-Cas12a, orange bar), respectively are shown. The editing efficiency of LEs treated with RNPs were significantly higher compared to LEs from the scramble control (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; t test, n = 9). Compared with Cas9-RNPs, treatment with Cas12a-RNPs (red) showed a statistically significant higher editing efficiency. (D) , Representative examples of <t>NGS</t> reads or Cas12a and Cas9, respectively, to show alleles with frequently seen profiles of deletions at the programmed cleavage positions e (red arrows) (n = 3). Abbreviations: CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; KO, knock-out, ns, not statistic significant; wt, wild type.
Next Generation Sequencing (Ngs) Services, supplied by Ebiogen Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/generation+sequencing+ngs+services/10__1172_slash_jci136779-366-7-12?v=Ebiogen+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
next-generation sequencing (ngs) services - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Editing GSH1 in S. mansoni showed an efficiency bias for Cas12a vs. Cas9 and prominent deletion patterns at this target locus. Synopsis of the comparative approach using Cas9 and Cas12a for programmed gene editing with the S. mansoni egg as biological target for transformation by electroporation. (A) Shown is a schematic overview of the GSH1 (SM_V7_Chr3; 13380432-13381848; 1,416 bp) target sites for Cas9 (blue arrow) and Cas12a (red arrow). DNA cleavage by Cas9 was expected to result in a blunt-ended cut, whereas Cas12a digested released overhanging DNA strands. The non-target DNA strand at GSH1was expected to be cleaved at the same position as illustrated. GSH1 regions highlighted in magenta represent the short homology arms, 50 nt used for the donor template. (B) LEs were subjected to electroporation in the presence of CX Rhodamine-labelled RNPs (red), after which they were counterstained with Hoechst33342 (blue) and examined by CLSM 24 h later. Introduction of RNPs was demonstrated (arrows) with both nucleases. The majority of Cas9 RNPs accumulated around the eggshell, a dissimilar pattern to that observed in the Cas12a RNP-treated LEs, where signals were also found inside the eggs. (C) Results of the determination of editing efficiencies by InDel abundance generated by Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs in GSH1, as analyzed by TIDE analysis . The editing efficiencies of GSH1-targeting RNPs normalized to the wild-type sequence (KO-Cas9, dark blue bar; KO-Cas12a, red bar) and RNPs non-specific to the S. mansoni genome (scramble-Cas9, purple bar; scramble-Cas12a, orange bar), respectively are shown. The editing efficiency of LEs treated with RNPs were significantly higher compared to LEs from the scramble control (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; t test, n = 9). Compared with Cas9-RNPs, treatment with Cas12a-RNPs (red) showed a statistically significant higher editing efficiency. (D) , Representative examples of NGS reads or Cas12a and Cas9, respectively, to show alleles with frequently seen profiles of deletions at the programmed cleavage positions e (red arrows) (n = 3). Abbreviations: CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; KO, knock-out, ns, not statistic significant; wt, wild type.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: ENHANCED EFFICIENCY OF RNA-GUIDED CAS12a VERSUS CAS9 TRANSGENE KNOCK-IN AND ACTIVITY AT A SCHISTOSOMA MANSONI GENOME SAFE HARBOR

doi: 10.1101/2023.09.12.557428

Figure Lengend Snippet: Editing GSH1 in S. mansoni showed an efficiency bias for Cas12a vs. Cas9 and prominent deletion patterns at this target locus. Synopsis of the comparative approach using Cas9 and Cas12a for programmed gene editing with the S. mansoni egg as biological target for transformation by electroporation. (A) Shown is a schematic overview of the GSH1 (SM_V7_Chr3; 13380432-13381848; 1,416 bp) target sites for Cas9 (blue arrow) and Cas12a (red arrow). DNA cleavage by Cas9 was expected to result in a blunt-ended cut, whereas Cas12a digested released overhanging DNA strands. The non-target DNA strand at GSH1was expected to be cleaved at the same position as illustrated. GSH1 regions highlighted in magenta represent the short homology arms, 50 nt used for the donor template. (B) LEs were subjected to electroporation in the presence of CX Rhodamine-labelled RNPs (red), after which they were counterstained with Hoechst33342 (blue) and examined by CLSM 24 h later. Introduction of RNPs was demonstrated (arrows) with both nucleases. The majority of Cas9 RNPs accumulated around the eggshell, a dissimilar pattern to that observed in the Cas12a RNP-treated LEs, where signals were also found inside the eggs. (C) Results of the determination of editing efficiencies by InDel abundance generated by Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs in GSH1, as analyzed by TIDE analysis . The editing efficiencies of GSH1-targeting RNPs normalized to the wild-type sequence (KO-Cas9, dark blue bar; KO-Cas12a, red bar) and RNPs non-specific to the S. mansoni genome (scramble-Cas9, purple bar; scramble-Cas12a, orange bar), respectively are shown. The editing efficiency of LEs treated with RNPs were significantly higher compared to LEs from the scramble control (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; t test, n = 9). Compared with Cas9-RNPs, treatment with Cas12a-RNPs (red) showed a statistically significant higher editing efficiency. (D) , Representative examples of NGS reads or Cas12a and Cas9, respectively, to show alleles with frequently seen profiles of deletions at the programmed cleavage positions e (red arrows) (n = 3). Abbreviations: CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; KO, knock-out, ns, not statistic significant; wt, wild type.

Article Snippet: Generated amplicons were suitable for the AmEZ service for next generation sequencing (NGS) (Azenta Life Sciences).

Techniques: Transformation Assay, Electroporation, Generated, Sequencing, Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy, Knock-Out